Skip to main content
Latest news
Thumbnail

US Congress Members Demand No 'Side Deals' With Taliban

In an open letter to the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, 22 US Congress members have raised concerns over the potential agreement between Washington and the Taliban, saying:  “The Taliban has a history of extracting concessions in exchange for false assurances.”

According to the letter, the Taliban will "accept nothing less" than a full-scale US withdrawal from Afghanistan as the group seeks to establish their totalitarian “Islamic Emirate.”

The letter raises concerns that the US military will involve the Taliban in counterterrorism operations, and that intelligence will be shared with the insurgent group.

Based on the letter, the congress members want no commitment of a full US withdrawal in the signed plan, among other demands.

The letter also states: “The Taliban is not a de facto counterterrorism partner, and pretending they are ignores their long-time jihadist mission and action. They continue to be closely allied with al-Qaeda and fight alongside them.”

The congress members have also suggested a set of demands which are as follows:

•             Any deal between the US and the Taliban will be public and not contain any secret annexes or side deals.

•             The administration will not put American security at risk by pretending that the Taliban is a reliable counter-terrorism partner.

•             There will be no intelligence sharing or “joint counterterrorism” center established with the Taliban. This would be a farce and put American lives at risk.

•             Decisions about US troop levels in Afghanistan must be made based on US national security requirements determined by conditions on the ground. Therefore, any deal must not contain a commitment for a full US withdrawal at this point. Such a commitment would embolden America’s adversaries and undermine our allies, including the Afghan government.

•             Any deal with the Taliban will include the requirement that the Taliban turn over all al-Qaeda leaders and operatives who are currently hiding in Taliban strongholds.

•             There will be no uneven or premature release of Taliban prisoners.

•             Current sanctions and designations against the al-Qaeda-allied Haqqani Network will remain in place regardless of any deal with the Taliban.

This comes as the US and the Taliban are expected to finalize a peace deal on February 29, if the ongoing reduction in violence (RIV) period is concluded successfully.

US Representative Liz Cheney, a signatory of the letter, on Wednesday at a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee asked Defense Secretary Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about any "side deals" or "secret annexes" in the planned US-Taliban deal, and wanted Gen. Milley to confirm that working with the Taliban in a counterterrorism role was "lunacy." 

Both Esper and Milley expressed no specific knowledge about what Representative Cheney was referring to, with Esper saying:

"Nothing comes to mind right now that you're mentioning,"  Both men reiterated that the deal is entirely "conditions-based" and the main priority is to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for terrorists.  

US Congress Members Demand No 'Side Deals' With Taliban

22 US Congress members signed a letter stating concerns about US reliance on the Taliban as a counterterrorism partner, among other things.  

Thumbnail

In an open letter to the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, 22 US Congress members have raised concerns over the potential agreement between Washington and the Taliban, saying:  “The Taliban has a history of extracting concessions in exchange for false assurances.”

According to the letter, the Taliban will "accept nothing less" than a full-scale US withdrawal from Afghanistan as the group seeks to establish their totalitarian “Islamic Emirate.”

The letter raises concerns that the US military will involve the Taliban in counterterrorism operations, and that intelligence will be shared with the insurgent group.

Based on the letter, the congress members want no commitment of a full US withdrawal in the signed plan, among other demands.

The letter also states: “The Taliban is not a de facto counterterrorism partner, and pretending they are ignores their long-time jihadist mission and action. They continue to be closely allied with al-Qaeda and fight alongside them.”

The congress members have also suggested a set of demands which are as follows:

•             Any deal between the US and the Taliban will be public and not contain any secret annexes or side deals.

•             The administration will not put American security at risk by pretending that the Taliban is a reliable counter-terrorism partner.

•             There will be no intelligence sharing or “joint counterterrorism” center established with the Taliban. This would be a farce and put American lives at risk.

•             Decisions about US troop levels in Afghanistan must be made based on US national security requirements determined by conditions on the ground. Therefore, any deal must not contain a commitment for a full US withdrawal at this point. Such a commitment would embolden America’s adversaries and undermine our allies, including the Afghan government.

•             Any deal with the Taliban will include the requirement that the Taliban turn over all al-Qaeda leaders and operatives who are currently hiding in Taliban strongholds.

•             There will be no uneven or premature release of Taliban prisoners.

•             Current sanctions and designations against the al-Qaeda-allied Haqqani Network will remain in place regardless of any deal with the Taliban.

This comes as the US and the Taliban are expected to finalize a peace deal on February 29, if the ongoing reduction in violence (RIV) period is concluded successfully.

US Representative Liz Cheney, a signatory of the letter, on Wednesday at a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee asked Defense Secretary Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about any "side deals" or "secret annexes" in the planned US-Taliban deal, and wanted Gen. Milley to confirm that working with the Taliban in a counterterrorism role was "lunacy." 

Both Esper and Milley expressed no specific knowledge about what Representative Cheney was referring to, with Esper saying:

"Nothing comes to mind right now that you're mentioning,"  Both men reiterated that the deal is entirely "conditions-based" and the main priority is to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for terrorists.  

Share this post

Comment this post